Microservices vs Monolith: Making the Right Architecture Decision

Microservices architecture has become an industry default recommendation, but the honest truth is that most enterprise applications — particularly at the scale typical of Malta businesses — are better served by a well-structured monolith, at least initially. Microservices solve specific problems (independent deployment of components, independent scaling, team autonomy at scale) but introduce significant operational complexity (distributed tracing, service discovery, eventual consistency, network failure handling) that is only justified when those specific problems genuinely exist.

A well-structured monolith using clean architecture principles — defined module boundaries, dependency injection, repository patterns, domain-driven design — delivers most of the code organisation benefits attributed to microservices without the operational overhead. When a monolith module genuinely needs to be extracted into an independent service (because it has different scaling requirements or needs independent deployment), the clean boundaries already exist to enable that extraction.

redskios advises on architecture decisions based on your actual constraints, not industry fashion. We build .NET microservices when they are genuinely warranted and well-structured monoliths on Laravel or .NET when they are the pragmatic choice. The goal is sustainable software that your team can operate, debug, and evolve — not an architecture diagram that looks impressive but creates operational burden.